Basketball fans have March Madness, political junkies get a big election every four years, and the Oscars roll around every February. For energy storage buffs, moments of collective anticipation are harder to come by.
Friday is as good as it gets, thanks to the long-awaited release of Massachusetts’ energy storage procurement target. Following a law passed last summer, the Department of Energy Resources took until the close of 2016 to decide a target was a good idea, and then had until July to name a number.
And the number is: 200 megawatt-hours by 2020.
That target comes with additional sweeteners like $10 million in additional funding for demonstration projects and a pledge to investigate eligibility for storage systems under the state Alternative Portfolio Standard. And, depending on how this first round goes, the DOER may add another target after 2020.
“Massachusetts’ biggest storage needs are tied to reducing peak loads, and through a megawatt-hour target, the DOER is setting a clever path for utilities to have the option of cutting peak load for longer durations, or to design plans to procure more short duration storage,” said Ravi Manghani, energy storage director at Greentech Media.
This mandate comes in lower than California’s 1.3 gigawatts, as is to be expected, but much higher than Oregon’s curiously unambitious target of 5 megawatt-hours per utility.
Achieving this will mark a big step up from the few megawatts installed in the state today, with nothing at the commercial scale and just 180 kilowatts of residential, according to GTM Research.
At first glance, the target looks small compared to the 600 megawatts suggested by the State of Charge report released by Massachusetts in September. That analysis found that 1,766 megawatts would optimize system benefits for ratepayers, but concluded that 600 by 2025 was more feasible and would save the state’s ratepayers $800 million in system costs. That level of storage would equate to roughly 5 percent of the state’s peak load.
However, the timeline is different: Achieving 200 megawatt-hours by 2020 could well set the state on a path to hit 600 megawatts by 2025. (Note the difference in units, as well.)
The storage industry rallied behind the 600-megawatt level as a good starting point after the report came out last year.

Green energy is a popular topic right now, with many countries signing on to the Paris Climate Accord and planning to move away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy.
To date, distributed-scale ESSs have focused on providing storage benefits to residential or commercial and industrial (C&I) host facilities, including resilient backup power and energy demand charge savings. Companies such as Green Charge Networks, Stem, and Sunverge are Leading Integrators of Distributed-Scale ESSs.
Work begins this month on solar-plus-storage projects in North Carolina that will deploy a total of 12MWh energy storage, by developer Cypress Creek Renewables and turnkey solar and storage provider United Renewable Energy.
Global research institute McKinsey & Company has analyzed current energy storage prices and concluded that commercial customers are already feeling the economic benefits of cheaper batteries and recent price falls in lithium-ion technology.
The Maryland Department of Transportation (“MDOT”) has issued a request for proposals (“RFP”) to create a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) to select contracts to design, construct, finance, and operate renewable energy facilities and energy storage projects at MDOT locations throughout the State of Maryland. The terms of the MSA will be five years, with an optional two year extension.
The Energy Storage Association announced that advanced energy industry veteran Kelly Speakes-Backman will become the organization’s first CEO, effective July 1.
Green Charge Networks, Stem, and Sunverge top a new list published by Navigant of companies that lead in distributed energy storage.