New York PSC Actions Move State Closer to Energy Storage, Climate Goals

on September 18, 2018

Utility-DiveThe detailed New York Energy Storage Roadmap lays out a comprehensive vision for using energy storage to meet the state’s energy goals, such as meeting 50% of electric power needs with clean energy sources by 2030.

Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo has called for an energy storage target of 1,500 MW by 2025. But the roadmap’s overall analysis, conducted by the Department of Public Service and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, supports an even more aggressive target, as high as 3,000 MW. And, as analysts have noted, moving the target to 2030 would better align the deadline of the state’s Clean Energy Standard with the energy storage target and allow more time to meet a higher target.

The environmental review of the roadmap found that energy target would bring positive environmental impacts such as reductions in peak load demand during critical periods, increases in the efficiency of the grid and the displacement of fossil fuel generation by allowing greater integration of renewable energy resources.

Storage systems could mitigate the impact of as much as 2 million metric tons of avoided greenhouse gas emissions and reduce the level of criteria air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and particulate matter, the PSC said.

With the environmental impact assessment of the roadmap approved by the PSC, the plan moves one step closer to implementation.

In a separate action, the PSC expanded the types of technologies that qualify to meet the state’s Clean Energy Standard. For the first time, some stand-alone storage systems will be eligible to help meet the clean energy target.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsNew York PSC Actions Move State Closer to Energy Storage, Climate Goals

MISO Closing in on Storage Participation Plan

on September 18, 2018

RTO-InsiderCARMEL, Ind. — MISO plans to hold a final Order 841 workshop on Oct. 10 to complete its collection of stakeholder opinions on its storage participation model, which will include an agreement for distribution-level storage but leave storage dispatch optimization to a later filing.

Here’s what the RTO has decided thus far.

Pro Forma for Distribution-connected Storage

MISO’s draft pro forma agreement for storage connected at the distribution level requires storage:

  • Be registered and modeled in MISO;
  • Secure agreements with distribution facilities so energy can be delivered to the MISO transmission system;
  • Be able to receive MISO operating instructions; and
  • Provide MISO with facility measurements and settlement meter data.

The agreement also specifies that MISO will make sure a storage resource owner isn’t charged twice for energy when it pays retail rates for wholesale charging. MISO said it will exclude the charging energy from wholesale rates in its settlements.

During a Sept. 13 Market Subcommittee meeting, Coalition of Midwest Power Producers CEO Mark Volpe asked if the agreement opens an avenue for distribution-connected storage assets to avoid MISO’s interconnection queue.

“This is not a way to circumvent the interconnection queue,” Director of Market Design Kevin Vannoy said.

“So you’re saying that distribution-level storage must go through the interconnection queue?” Volpe asked.

“I don’t have a definitive answer for that,” Vannoy responded.

Consumers Energy’s Jeff Beattie pointed out that many qualifying facilities that utilities must purchase power from under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act are connected at the distribution level.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsMISO Closing in on Storage Participation Plan

Are Microgrids the Future for Utilities?

on September 17, 2018

There’s currently a lot of talk about how we support environmental legislation while balancing a grid under pressure, not to mention how to meet future energy demands. In answering those questions, there are many different solutions being discussed and explored.

In areas such as North and South America specifically, frequent severe weather incidents that bring down grid power for weeks and months, such as last year’s Hurricane Irma and the more immediate Hurricane Florence, require much more direct and immediate solutions.

And this is where the use of a decentralized grid or microgrids are now not only being trialled for critical backup power, but for some more remote communities, used as mainstream primary power too. For the modern utility business, these solutions are very different, but increasingly viewed as very compelling business models – and for me, they’re really exciting too.

The compromise for many, though, has been the continued reliance on polluting and un-environmental diesel generator technology to support these projects. However, there’s now a 100 percent clean, weather independent solution that’s not only ready to replace diesel generators, but also provide a host of other benefits too – the modern fuel cell.

What is a microgrid?

If you’re unfamiliar with the microgrid concept, according to the US Department of Energy: “A microgrid is a local energy grid with control capability, which means it can disconnect from the traditional grid and operate autonomously. A microgrid can be powered by distributed generators, batteries, and/or renewable resources like solar panels. Depending on how it’s fuelled and how its requirements are managed, a microgrid might run indefinitely.”

Essentially, a microgrid can backup the grid, or crucially, operate independently. This makes them hugely attractive to local communities wishing to take control of their power generation, as well as rural communities looking for robust and independent electricity supply.

In the continued global shift to renewable energy generation to counter climate change, microgrids enable communities large and small to improve local energy delivery by leveraging the best of green technologies.

Very often, various renewable technologies such as wind turbines and solar panels can be placed within residential buildings, alongside a battery to provide an alternative power source to the grid – not only providing environmental benefits, but also increasing energy efficiency and cost-savings. However, the performance of renewables is subject to variable weather conditions, which frustrates their ability to provide 100 per cent reliability.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsAre Microgrids the Future for Utilities?

Is That Battery Cycle Worth It? Maximising Energy Storage Lifecycle Value With Avanced Controls

on September 17, 2018

Energy-Storage-NewsEnergy storage is a compelling complement to wind and solar, because of high flexibility and ability to operate as both load, when it charges, and generation, when the energy is deployed. Energy storage addresses many of the challenges to grid operators providing safe and reliable electricity for customers, and due to rapidly declining costs, performance improvements of lithium-ion batteries and an emergence of “grid-ready” energy storage products, commercially viable grid energy storage has now arrived, in certain applications. As energy storage becomes more widely available and economically feasible, it may make renewable generation, when paired with energy storage, a more viable option to provide reliable electric generation – and load demand – service in more areas of the world.

Storage anywhere

Energy storage can be deployed everywhere in the power grid, connected to transmission (T), distribution (D), or on customer-side of the meter. Storage may be co-located with renewables, conventional generation, loads, or it may be standalone.

Energy storage connected to the end customer could potentially address services upstream to support distribution, transmission, and generation functions, because its dispatch also propagates upstream. In contrast, a transmission-connected system typically cannot provide downstream services. Larger systems take advantage of economies of scale, which may offset access limitations for certain value streams.

Is that cycle worth it?

Service stacking comes with the costs and complications of multiple, potentially competing, commitments, which may also increase the wear and tear on energy storage systems. When designing an energy storage project, it is important to understand the value and associated requirements for each service addressed. Energy storage is still a relatively expensive resource, so excessive sizing or operation without an associated payback may cause a potential project to become uneconomic.

A common and desirable use of energy storage is often called peak shaving i.e. reducing the amount of power drawn from the grid beyond a specified limit. This typically maps to more precise services, such as resource adequacy (i.e. peaker plant substitution) or transmission or distribution upgrade deferral (i.e. non-wires alternatives). The sizing, availability, and location of energy storage for these services is critical, but the required dispatch may be infrequent when the grid is under stress, to achieve the desired benefit of deferring or avoiding an alternative major capital investment.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsIs That Battery Cycle Worth It? Maximising Energy Storage Lifecycle Value With Avanced Controls

Massachusetts Deploys Utility-Scale Energy Storage

on September 17, 2018

RTO-InsiderNational Grid has begun operating a vanadium redox-flow battery (VRB) with its 1-MW solar PV array in Shirley, Mass., to demonstrate utility operation of storage.

The company was the prime recipient of an $875,000 Massachusetts grant awarded to an application team that also includes Vionx Energy, Worcester Polytechnic Institute and the Energy Initiatives Group. (See Massachusetts Awards $20M in Energy Storage Grants.)

Carlos Nouel, vice president of innovation and development at National Grid, told RTO Insider that “the Shirley project will serve as a test bed for integrating storage and solar through the use of flow batteries, and support the development of new frameworks for dispatching stored solar power.”

Massachusetts lags far behind California in deploying utility-scale energy storage, but it is trying to integrate the technology into its power supply.

California utilities must procure more than 1.3 GW of energy storage by 2020. As of August, the state’s three largest investor-owned utilities are in the process of actually procuring nearly 1.5 GW, with about 332 MW currently online, according to a report last month by the California Energy Commission.

In contrast, Massachusetts last year said the state’s utilities must procure a combined 200 MWh of energy storage by Jan. 1, 2020. ISO-NE in April reported more than 500 MW of storage capacity in its interconnection queue. (See Overheard at the Energy Storage Association Annual Conference.)

Home-Grown Storage

Vionx (rhymes with “bionics”) is supplying the energy storage system for the Shirley solar project, which lies about 30 miles west of the company’s lab and headquarters in Woburn, Mass.

The company uses vanadium rather than lithium for energy storage, seeing the alternative flow battery technology as the best fit for utility-scale applications, including microgrids or industrial, behind-the-meter systems.

The use of vanadium in a flow battery was first explored in the 1930s and only made workable in Australia in the mid-1980s. Today, many companies use the technology, from giant Sumitomo to tiny CellCube, a VRB manufacturer trying to vertically integrate with its own vanadium mine in Nevada.

A VRB stores chemical energy in the form of vanadium-based electrolyte and generates electricity by inducing a reduction-oxidation (redox) reaction: that is, a transformation of matter by electron transfer across an ion exchange membrane, within a battery stack. The reaction is achieved by either applying an electrical load (discharge) or an electrical supply (charge) to the battery stack as the electrolyte is flowing or being pumped across the membrane.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsMassachusetts Deploys Utility-Scale Energy Storage

ABB Boosts Power With Microgrid And Battery Energy Storage Innovations

on September 14, 2018

Utilities-Middle-EastPower grid infrastructure in many parts of the United States is aging and struggling to meet increased electricity demand. In some specific areas, like ports and industrial facilities, high-powered equipment cannot be fully deployed because the grid cannot meet the intense but sporadic load demands.

The options for these necessary upgrades range widely, but can include protection equipment upgrades, pole replacement, communication networks, new lines for distribution of electricity, voltage support and system capacity increases.

With their flexibility and innovative features, ABB’s state-of-the-art microgrids and battery energy storage systems (BESS), are providing utilities and industries with innovative alternatives.

In Baltimore, MD, in response to growth and increased demand for power, ABB is supplying a BESS to Baltimore Gas and Electric (BGE). The utility was forecasting an increase in peak demand that would cause equipment to exceed its thermal capacity.

BG&E had to evaluate the cost to perform a capacity upgrade of its substation equipment versus the costs of utilizing energy storage solution. ABB proposed a BESS solution that would be quick and cost-efficient to deploy.

The BESS, commissioned in March, is key for BGE, as it enables the utility to use electricity stored within the battery for the periods of this increased peak demand. The peak shaving made possible with the BESS gives the utility the power reliability needed through an alternative solution, one that is now being considered by more and more utilities across the continent.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsABB Boosts Power With Microgrid And Battery Energy Storage Innovations

Is That Battery Cycle Worth It? Maximising Energy Storage Lifecycle Value With Advanced Controls

on September 14, 2018

Energy-Storage-NewsEnergy storage is a compelling complement to wind and solar, because of high flexibility and ability to operate as both load, when it charges, and generation, when the energy is deployed. Energy storage addresses many of the challenges to grid operators providing safe and reliable electricity for customers, and due to rapidly declining costs, performance improvements of lithium-ion batteries and an emergence of “grid-ready” energy storage products, commercially viable grid energy storage has now arrived, in certain applications. As energy storage becomes more widely available and economically feasible, it may make renewable generation, when paired with energy storage, a more viable option to provide reliable electric generation – and load demand – service in more areas of the world.

Storage anywhere

Energy storage can be deployed everywhere in the power grid, connected to transmission (T), distribution (D), or on customer-side of the meter. Storage may be co-located with renewables, conventional generation, loads, or it may be standalone.

Energy storage connected to the end customer could potentially address services upstream to support distribution, transmission, and generation functions, because its dispatch also propagates upstream. In contrast, a transmission-connected system typically cannot provide downstream services. Larger systems take advantage of economies of scale, which may offset access limitations for certain value streams.

Is that cycle worth it?

Service stacking comes with the costs and complications of multiple, potentially competing, commitments, which may also increase the wear and tear on energy storage systems. When designing an energy storage project, it is important to understand the value and associated requirements for each service addressed. Energy storage is still a relatively expensive resource, so excessive sizing or operation without an associated payback may cause a potential project to become uneconomic.

A common and desirable use of energy storage is often called peak shaving i.e. reducing the amount of power drawn from the grid beyond a specified limit. This typically maps to more precise services, such as resource adequacy (i.e. peaker plant substitution) or transmission or distribution upgrade deferral (i.e. non-wires alternatives). The sizing, availability, and location of energy storage for these services is critical, but the required dispatch may be infrequent when the grid is under stress, to achieve the desired benefit of deferring or avoiding an alternative major capital investment.

Other services, such as spinning and non-spinning reserves, may also be desirable with energy storage with very low operating costs because they essentially require energy storage to act as a reserve with no dispatch. Energy storage may also be able to offer these services while charging, by committing to stop charging if needed.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsIs That Battery Cycle Worth It? Maximising Energy Storage Lifecycle Value With Advanced Controls

Why Lithium-Ion May Rule Batteries For A Long Time To Come

on September 14, 2018

MIT-Technology-ReviewThe US Department of Energy is launching a major research effort to develop a new generation of lithium-ion batteries largely free of cobalt, a rare and expensive metal delivered through an increasingly troubling supply chain.

The three-year program, part of a broader effort to accelerate advanced vehicle technologies, could eventually lead to cheaper, longer-lasting consumer gadgets, electric cars, and grid storage.

Materials scientist Gerd Ceder is overseeing one project under the research program at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, aimed at developing “disordered rock salts” as an alternative material for cathodes, the positive electrode in a rechargeable cell. Typically, the cathodes in lithium-ion batteries require cobalt to create and retain a layered structure in the electrode, which allows lithium ions to easily flow through it. But several years ago, Ceder and his colleagues found that this new class of materials could store more lithium, potentially boosting energy density while avoiding the need for cobalt entirely (see “Disordered materials hold promise for better batteries”).

The Lawrence Berkeley project as well as two at Argonne National Laboratory together received $12.5 million from the DOE’s Vehicle Technologies Office.

In an interview with MIT Technology Review, Ceder discussed the challenges to ensure that the new materials work as a “drop-in” alternative for battery manufacturing, the reasons lithium-ion technology will continue to dominate storage for a long time to come—and why it takes so long for any battery advance to reach the marketplace.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsWhy Lithium-Ion May Rule Batteries For A Long Time To Come

Energy Storage to Play Key Role in Reaching California Target of 100% Zero-Emission Electricity by 2045 and Beyond

on September 12, 2018

Energy Storage North America (ESNA), the most influential gathering of policy, technology and market leaders in energy storage, applauds Governor Jerry Brown and the California State Legislature for passing landmark Senate Bill (SB) 100, which sets the largest-scale zero-emission electricity targets ever established for a U.S. state.

From November 6-8 in Pasadena, California, ESNA sponsors, exhibitors, speakers and attendees will gather to demonstrate that the energy storage industry is ready with technology and deployment solutions to successfully support a zero-emission grid. Since 2010, California has procured more than 1,500 MW of new energy storage capacity; North American energy users and utilities have collectively procured over 2 GW of advanced energy storage projects to date.

“Energy Storage is critical to supporting the increasing penetration of renewables throughout North America and the globe, and our community is ready to deliver,” said Janice Lin, Co-founder and Chair of ESNA. “ESNA brings together the key decision makers who are demonstrating the game-changing role energy storage can play to achieve grid transformation. Storage has proven its ability to integrate intermittent renewable energy and optimize existing assets for a cleaner, more affordable and reliable grid.”

California investor-owned utilities are already demonstrating their leadership toward achieving SB 100 goals. For example, last month Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) that highlighted the significant role of energy storage in achieving the state’s electricity sector greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction goals by 2030. SCE models showed that in order to reduce its grid-based GHG emissions to 28 million metric tons by 2030, California load-serving entities would need to procure an additional 9,604 MW of energy storage.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsEnergy Storage to Play Key Role in Reaching California Target of 100% Zero-Emission Electricity by 2045 and Beyond

California ISO Board Approves Measures to Propel Energy Storage, DERs

on September 12, 2018

Utility-DiveSeveral of the proposals approved by CAISO’s board on Wednesday were part of the third and final phase of the Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Resources (ESDER) initiative that stakeholders launched to foster greater participation of those resources in the wholesale market.

The proposals remove one more set of barriers and would allow greater participation of DERs and energy storage in the wholesale market, CAISO spokesman Steven Greenlee told Utility Dive.

The proposal approved for energy storage would allow BTM batteries to more easily consume energy during oversupply conditions and return that energy to the system during times of need.

BTM batteries can already participate in CAISO’s day-ahead and real time markets, but the proposed change to ISO rules would allow two resource identifications for one storage unit, depending on whether it is charging or discharging energy.

The rule change would create a new product, the proxy demand resource-load shift resource (PDR-LSR) that would help avoid confusion when a storage unit receives conflicting dispatch signals. In addition, it would allow a storage device to enter separate bids for charging and discharging.

That would help “incentivize behind-the-meter storage operators to operate their unit in alignment with grid needs,” Greenlee said. For example, he said, it would provide a signal for battery operators not to send energy to the grid when it is not needed or to charge when the energy is needed. The proposal would require direct metering of BTM batteries.

There is a separate proceeding underway at CAISO that is studying how transmission-connected storage assets can participate in the ISO’s energy and ancillary services markets.

read more
Fractal Energy Storage ConsultantsCalifornia ISO Board Approves Measures to Propel Energy Storage, DERs