Minnesota electric cooperative Connexus Energy has confirmed recent press reports that it is building 15MW / 30MWh of battery energy storage, while another not-for-profit, Vermont Electric Cooperative, will build a 1.9MW / 5.3MWh system in its service area.

Connexus is part of Great River Energy, an electric transmission and generation cooperative and the second largest utility in Minnesota. Connexus serves about 130,000 residential and commercial properties in its service area. It issued a statement yesterday stating that the “innovative” solar-plus-storage project is now under construction.

Pairing 10MW of solar across two sites with 15MW of battery storage, also split between the Ramsey and Athens Township solar farm sites, the cooperative wants to use the combination to help manage peak demand. A subsidiary of major developer NextEra Energy will build, own and operate the lithium-ion battery storage systems, which Connexus said will be “fully integrated” with the solar PV. ENGIE North America will be responsible for the solar portions of the projects.

“Energy prices differ throughout the day. Most solar energy is produced when there is lower demand and the price is lower. Our plan is to discharge the stored solar energy during peak hours when energy costs are the highest. We refer to this as time-shifting solar energy to a time of day when it has more value,” Greg Ridderbusch, Connexus CEO said.

Ridderbusch said that the utility had listened to its members, who want more renewable energy on their network, Ridderbusch said, but did not want to pay more for their electricity.

A 2017 study found Minnesota could use energy storage and solar as part of a “least-cost path forward” in direct competition with gas turbines. ‘Modernising Minnesota’s Grid: An economic analysis of energy storage opportunities’, was produced by University of Minnesota’s Energy Transition Lab with Strategen Consulting and Vibrant Clean Energy.

Among the key findings of that report were:

• Under an optimal set of future energy resource investments and operating practices, the least-cost solutions included energy storage.
• Energy storage can be a cost-effective means to help Minnesota meet its state greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals.
• The deployment of storage in Minnesota was projected to increase the use of low-cost renewable energy generation dispatched in MISO and to reduce the need for expensive transmission investments.
• Historically, utilities have used gas combustion turbines to meet peak demand. As storage becomes more cost-effective, it will compete with and displace new gas combustion peaking plants (peakers).
• Compared to a simple-cycle gas-fired peaking plant, storage was more cost-effective at meeting Minnesota’s capacity needs beyond 2022.
• Additionally, the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) which discounts storage purchases when made with solar, already makes solar-plus-storage more cost-effective than a peaking plant as well as having an environmental benefit in reducing GHGs.

Energy storage has been taking root across the country, but coastal states, such as California, Massachusetts and Oregon, have taken the lead in implementing related policies. That could change as states such as Colorado and Nevada move closer to potentially ambitious policies to support energy storage.

Rising renewable penetration combined with falling costs for lithium-ion batteries is driving many states to explore policies that encourage energy storage.

New Jersey became the most recent state to adopt an energy storage target when Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy in May signed a bill that establishes a 2,000 MW by 2030 target. And in New York, the Public Service Commission is in the process of setting an energy storage target that some observers say could end up as high as 3,000 MW by 2030.

But Arizona could be the next state to adopt an energy storage goal, if Commissioner Andy Tobin has his way.

“Energy storage is high on my list,” Tobin told Utility Dive.

The man with the plan

The Energy Modernization Plan that Tobin released in January includes a recommended target for 3,000 MW of energy storage deployed by 2030. The plan would have the state be powered by 80% clean energy by 2050, from 15% by 2025, and directs the investor owned utilities to build 60 MW of biomass plants for service by 2022.

The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) “could be voting on the plan by January or February,” Tobin said.

“We thought we had enough votes” to put it on the docket, Tobin said at the commission last month. Instead, the ACC decided to do a study on the financial impact of the plan. That study, being prepared by the state’s Residential Utility Consumer Office, should be ready in about two weeks.

Tobin wants to see the adoption of his plan ahead of the next fire season, as the biomass plant component could burn fuel from Arizona’s forests and lessen the devastation of forest fires.

Tobin is optimistic, noting that some commissioners are already on board.

The state’s investor-owned utilities have responded to the proposed energy plan with proposals for energy storage projects, according to Tobin. Tucson Electric Power is considering participating in the 2,000 MW Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage Hydroelectric project proposed by ITC Grid Development. And Arizona Public Service has proposed a solar-plus-storage project that includes a 50 MW, 135 MWh battery to serve a 65 MW solar farm.

Following suit

In addition to the progress in Arizona and New York, Timothy Fox, vice president at ClearView Energy Partners, is also tracking developments in Nevada where a regulatory proceeding is underway to create a storage target pursuant to S.B. 204, enacted last spring.

GTM Research also recently began tracking Nevada and Colorado for energy storage policies.

“There are some large utility projects going on” in Nevada, Brett Simon, senior energy storage analyst at GTM Research, told Utility Dive. The state’s constant shifts on net metering policies for solar power are driving interest in residential storage that can be used to time shift solar power generation from mid-day to the evening, he said.

The Alaskan city of Kotzebue has integrated a Saft lithium-ion (Li-ion) energy storage system (ESS) into its off-grid microgrid. The ESS enables the hybrid wind-diesel power system to achieve its full potential, providing cleaner, more reliable and less expensive power to a remote community of 3,700 people.

Kotzebue is located 30 miles north of the Arctic Circle, far from the nearest transmission grid. Historically, KEA (Kotzebue Electric Association), the city’s electricity cooperative, has relied on diesel generators. However, since the late 1990s KEA has committed to making every effort to reduce its dependence on diesel and has invested in wind energy. But the intermittent nature of the wind meant that KEA still had to run its diesel generators, often resulting in curtailment when the wind turbines were providing their peak output. This challenge prompted KEA to seek a solution to utilizeits excess wind capacity.

Maintaining stability and minimizing curtailment

In general, an ESS becomes essential to maintain grid stability when the penetration of renewables within a microgrid rises above 50 percent. In KEA’s case its wind capacity of 2.9 MW is close to its 3 MW peak load, so the same ESS can also time-shift wind energy to help minimize curtailment.

KEA added a Saft Intensium® Max+ 20M ESS to its microgrid with two key aims:

• to achieve the full potential of its wind power by riding through fluctuations in output and time-shifting wind energy,
• to facilitate operation in ‘diesel-off’ mode with power provided only by a combination of wind and storage during periods of high wind and low load.

KEA microgrid – key facts

• Serves a remote off-grid community of 3,700 people
• Winter temperatures can fall to -50°C
• Combines diesel generators, wind turbines and energy storage
• 3 MW peak load
• 19 wind turbines – total 2.9 MW
• 6 diesel generators – total 11 MW
• 500 MW solar planned for the future

Aug 06, 2018 (Heraldkeeper via COMTEX) — New York, August 07, 2018: The scope of the report includes a detailed study of Battery Energy Storage System Market with the reasons given for variations in the growth of the industry in certain regions.

The report covers detailed competitive outlook including the market share and company profiles of the key participants operating in the global market. Key players profiled in the report ABB Ltd., General Electric Co., Tesla Motors Ltd, and Siemens AG. Company profile includes assign such as company summary, financial summary, business strategy and planning, SWOT analysis and current developments.

The Battery Energy Storage System Market is expected to exceed more than US$ 9 Billion by 2024 at a CAGR of 34% in the given forecast period.

The battery energy storage system market has expanded significantly in recent years owing to increasing demand for renewable energy sources. Some necessary applications of battery energy storage systems include electrification of grid and this needs great deal of renewable energy resources, therefore contribute to the consistent increase in demand for battery energy storage system. Gradual advancement in energy storage technology leads to important value reduction and enhances the efficiency of battery energy storage system. This, in turn, is probably going to boost its demand within the market throughout the forecast period.

The Battery Energy Storage System Market is segmented on the Basis of Element Type, Connection Type, Application Type, Ownership Type, Type and Regional Analysis. By Element Type this market is segmented on the basis of Battery and Hardware.

By Connection Type this market is segmented on the basis of On-Grid and Off-Grid. By Application Type this market is segmented on the basis of Residential, Non-Residential and Utilities. By Ownership Type this market is segmented on the basis of Customer Owned, Third-Party Owned and Utility Owned. By Type this market is segmented on the basis of Lithium-Ion Batteries, Sodium-Sulphur Batteries, Advanced Lead-Acid Batteries and Flow Batteries. By Regional Analysis this market is segmented on the Basis of North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World.

Danish brewer Carlsberg is considering installation of an energy storage facility at its Falkenberg plant in Sweden.

Carlsberg’s director of environment and utilities, Adam Pawelas told the edie Powering Ahead webinar  that the global brewer is in the “early stages” of exploring integration methods for energy storage to support onsite generation.

During the webinar, Carlsberg’s director of environment and utilities, Adam Pawelas, noted that storage solutions are being explored by the brewer, but only as one part of the energy matrix.

“At the moment, we consider battery storage a supplementary solution. We are at the early stages and will not be focusing solely on batteries,” Pawelas said. “In some markets, power-load management is a feasible option to be an active player either by us or by a third party.”

“We have some locations where we would like to grow our solar projects where our base load will not be able to consume the installed capacity of those solar PV systems, and there, we will consider the extension of battery storage.”

Carlsberg signed up to the 1.5C emission reduction target set by the Paris Agreement. It currently sources 45% of its electricity onsite. The company has vowed to source 100% renewable electricity and eliminate coal as a source of energy by 2022.

In the midst of an earnings call dominated by discussions about Tesla’s long-awaited Model 3 electric car, CEO Elon Musk also discussed the company’s energy storage business.

Musk noted that Tesla had shut down a Powerwall battery manufacturing production line in order to make more batteries for its Model 3 car, but said “we’re adding new cell lines and we’ll be able to address” cell shortages very soon.

That will enable Tesla to soon triple its storage business, CFO Deepak Ahuja, said.

Jeffrey Straubel, Tesla’s chief technology officer, noted that the 1 GWh number the company offered analysts for guidance is “a big number … maybe on the order of 300% what we did the prior year and we’re still aiming at maybe another 3 times to 4 times growth for 2019.”

“These are insane growth levels,” Musk said.

Musk said that one of the challenges Tesla is facing in growing its energy storage business is a shortage of trained electricians. It takes two years to train and certify an electrician. “We obviously can’t grow faster than the rates, the number of electricians who can physically install a Powerwall. That’s like one of the limitations.”

Musk also noted some limitations on the growth of its solar business. Tesla reported that it installed 84 MW of solar power in the quarter, which is 11% higher than in the first quarter but down 52% from the same quarter last year. The company said solar growth rates should remain stable for the rest of the year and attributed the slower pace to the difficulty of validating the life span of the company’s solar rooftop shingles, which the company has said can last anywhere from 30 to 50 years.

Tesla projected that “solar deployments should remain stable in the second half of this year.” If the pace of the past three months holds through the end of 2018, Tesla will end the year with 329 MW of solar power deployed, its lowest four quarter total since 2014.

“We now have several hundred homes with the Solar Roof on them, and that’s going well,” Musk said. He also mentioned that Tesla is working with first responders to make sure its solar roofs are safe in the event of a fire.

Musk said he expects to ramp up production of solar cells at the company’s Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, N.Y., next year.

Clean energy advocates are increasingly focusing their hopes on battery storage to supply power to the grid from the sun and the wind, particularly during times of peak demand when the weather might be, inconveniently, cloudy and still.

In fact, the clean energy bill passed this week on Beacon Hill called for increasing the energy storage target from 200 megawatts to 1,000 megawatts by the end of 2025, and ordered study of a mobile emergency relief battery system. “Batteries are key to extending the life of clean energy and we want to see that battery sector really grow,” state Senator Michael Barrett told the State House News Service on Monday night. “So this is a major job-creation piece.”

He’s got that right. Lithium-ion batteries have improved markedly in recent years and are being used in New England, California, and in Europe to store power from renewable energy sources. In Casco Bay, Maine, a battery room packed with more than 1,000 lithium-ion batteries helps stabilize the grid, according to NextEra, helping to keep electricity flowing at 60 hertz, or cycles per second, the longtime standard for US households. And ISO New England reports that there are a dozen projects in the pipeline that involve connecting a battery to either a new or existing solar or wind facility.

Because renewable energy sources are crucial for reducing the greenhouse gases responsible for climate change, demand is only going to increase as stricter regulations kick in and as new products are developed — car companies project that 10 million to 20 million electric vehicles will be produced each year by 2025.

We all know that Tesla’s all-electric car catalog is really, really cool. Who wouldn’t want to have a Tesla Model S, X, 3, and/or Roadster in her garage? But Tesla’s energy products also have great potential to hasten the world’s inevitable shift towards sustainable energy.

Yesterday’s Tesla shareholder letter and accompanying conference call outlined, in part, the current status of Tesla energy products and the future of this component of the company. As utilities, energy companies, commercial entities, and homeowners quickly realize the benefits of battery storage, the picture will look increasingly brighter for Tesla Energy — even if the numbers right now are a bit lackluster.

With the acquisition of SolarCity and Gigafactory 2, Tesla offers a full suite of energy products that incorporates solar, storage, and grid services. As the world’s only fully integrated sustainable energy company, it is encouraging businesses and people to think electric car + solar panels + battery storage as an integrated whole.

What yesterday’s investor and media announcements indicated, however, is that Tesla Energy is in transition. There is tremendous demand, but relatively low Tesla solar volumes are expected in 2018. In total, cash flow from solar is anticipated to remain neutral and relatively stable for the remainder of 2018, the company said.

In May 2018, Tesla reached the goal of deploying 1 GWh of energy storage worldwide after fewer than 5 years. Near-term goals are to add another 1 GWh of energy storage within 9 to 12 months.

Demand for Tesla’s energy storage products can’t keep up with production even as the company continually adds capacity. That means growing energy business revenue in the remainder of 2018, but more around the corner.

In response to a question from CleanTechnica Director Zachary Shahan, Tesla CEO Elon Musk stated, “we’re kind of cell starved for Powerwall right now, so we actually had to artificially limit the number of Powerwalls because we don’t have enough cells. So we’re solving for that very rapidly and we expect to ramp up Powerwall and Powerpack production substantially later this year and early next — as well as ramping up retrofit solar and then the Solar Roof.”

SEIA’s measured reaction